ISP-Direct vs Self-Serve
Quick pick
→ ISP-direct residential infrastructure or a 1M+ ISP static pool for persistent sessions are the requirements — and the budget supports a high subscription commitment. NetNut fits.
→ Immediate access without KYC, a permanent free tier to test, API activity logs from day one, or per-IP datacenter pricing are the priorities. Webshare fits.
NetNut and Webshare represent opposite ends of the proxy market's commitment and complexity curve. NetNut requires organizational KYC, a high monthly subscription minimum, and concentrates premium features at the highest plan tier. Webshare requires nothing upfront — a permanent free tier, no KYC at signup, and a REST API with activity logs accessible from day one.
What NetNut offers in return for that commitment is architectural: residential traffic routed through ISP connectivity points via DiviNetworks rather than consumer devices, and a 1M+ ISP static pool for persistent sessions. What Webshare offers in return for that accessibility is operational: per-IP datacenter pricing, unlimited bandwidth options, and a self-serve proxy management API.
Teams choosing between them have fundamentally different starting points — organizational readiness versus operational immediacy.
Quick Answer
NetNut suits teams whose residential workload benefits from ISP-direct infrastructure and who need a large ISP static pool for persistent sessions. The limitations: city and state targeting require the Master tier, API access is plan-gated to the same tier, no PAYG exists, and the minimum commitment is high.
Webshare suits teams that want immediate frictionless access — a permanent free datacenter tier, no KYC, REST API with activity logs from signup, and per-IP pricing with unlimited bandwidth. The limitations: mobile proxies are not offered, ASN and ZIP targeting are not documented, no SLA exists, and GDPR compliance is not explicitly stated.
Different Philosophies
NetNut's philosophy is that residential proxy stability benefits from eliminating consumer device dependency. ISP-direct sourcing through DiviNetworks routes traffic at ISP connectivity points rather than end-user devices — no device uptime variability, no peer behavior uncertainty. The 1M+ ISP static pool extends that consistency into persistent-session workloads. The trade-off is a pricing model that gates premium features behind high-tier subscriptions.
Webshare's philosophy is that the right proxy product is the one a team can use before it knows what it needs. A permanent free tier, no credit card, no KYC at signup — zero cost to start. The REST API exposes activity logs from the start. Per-IP datacenter pricing at a low floor enables volume testing before committing to residential. Self-serve purchase across all proxy types requires no sales conversation.
You gain ISP-direct infrastructure stability and a large static pool with NetNut. You give up zero-friction immediate entry. With Webshare, the trade runs in reverse — you gain self-serve access and per-IP pricing flexibility, and ISP-sourced residential consistency, mobile proxies, and a large static pool become unavailable.
Network & Coverage
NetNut's rotating residential pool is provider-reported at 85M+ IPs across 200+ countries, sourced as ISP-direct and P2P hybrid. Country-level targeting available on all plans. City and state targeting require Master tier. ASN and ZIP targeting not documented. ISP static pool provider-reported at 1M+ IPs in 50+ countries. Mobile proxies cover 5M IPs in 100+ countries. Sticky session TTL not documented.
Webshare's residential pool is provider-reported at 80M+ IPs across 195 countries. Targeting supports country and city level. ASN and ZIP targeting not documented. Mobile proxies not offered. ISP static proxies available through named ISP partners in limited countries. Sticky session TTL values not published. Datacenter proxies available in shared, private, and dedicated configurations with unlimited bandwidth options.
Integration & Setup
NetNut authenticates via username and password. IP allow-listing available on Production plan and above. API access plan-gated to Master tier. Live chat plan-gated to Production and above. Overages require account manager contact.
Webshare supports three authentication methods: username and password, IP whitelist, and API token. REST API at apidocs.webshare.io covers proxy list retrieval, configuration, activity logs, and usage statistics — activity logs accessible from the free tier. Rotation mode configurable via API parameter. Sub-user management not documented. No KYC required at signup.
Pricing Logic
NetNut requires a monthly subscription with no PAYG option. High entry minimum. City targeting, API access, and live support all plan-gated to higher tiers. A 7-day free trial for registered companies requires KYC. Overages require account manager contact.
Webshare offers a permanent free tier — 10 datacenter proxies with up to 1 GB per month, no credit card required. Paid plans bill datacenter per IP and residential per GB with unlimited bandwidth options. Refund available within 2 days if usage below documented thresholds. All rates publicly listed.
Decision Snapshot
ISP-direct residential infrastructure or a 1M+ ISP static pool for persistent sessions are the requirements — and the budget supports a high subscription commitment. NetNut fits.
Immediate access without KYC, a permanent free tier to test, API activity logs from day one, or per-IP datacenter pricing are the priorities. Webshare fits.
You gain ISP-direct consistency and a large static pool with NetNut. You give up zero-friction entry and self-serve flexibility. With Webshare, the trade runs in reverse — you gain immediate self-serve access and per-IP flexibility, and ISP-sourced infrastructure, mobile proxies, and the static pool become unavailable.
Neither fits teams that need mobile proxies with accessible entry mechanics.
Decision Lens
Ask whether your residential workload specifically benefits from ISP-sourced IPs without consumer device dependency — and whether the subscription commitment and plan-gating of features at higher tiers fits your budget and timeline. If yes, NetNut's ISP-direct architecture addresses those requirements.
Ask whether your team needs to start making requests before requirements are finalized — or whether per-IP datacenter pricing and self-serve API access are the operational priorities. If yes, Webshare's free tier and accessible API address that workflow directly, and the absence of mobile proxies and ISP-direct residential are the constraints to accept.
If your requirement is ISP-direct consistency and a large static pool — NetNut. If your requirement is immediate self-serve access and no-cost evaluation — Webshare.
Which one is a better fit for you?
NetNut's architectural claim is ISP-direct routing via DiviNetworks: the rotating residential pool includes an ISP-direct component sourced through B2B commercial agreements with ISPs, not through a peer SDK on user devices. The practical consequence is a different network stability profile compared to peer-sourced availability models — servers sit at ISP network connectivity points controlled by NetNut rather than depending on third-party device availability. The rotating pool is hybrid, however: it includes both the ISP-direct component and P2P sources. The plan structure creates hard gates on nearly every advanced feature — city targeting, API access, and IP allowlist are all locked to higher-tier plans.
Webshare's defining feature is the permanent free tier: 10 datacenter proxies with 1 GB per month, no credit card required and no trial clock. This is a permanent free entry point for testing datacenter proxies against real targets without upfront spend. The proxy network is API-first — rotation mode, targeting, and session configuration are all controlled through the documented REST API, not a visual dashboard. Mobile proxies are not offered. For teams whose targets require residential IP quality or mobile network IPs, Webshare is the wrong tool.
Explore each provider in detail
More with NetNut or Webshare
Not sure yet?
© 2026 Softplorer